While we were in Liberia, Scott, the missionary that we traveled with, was also our travel guide. He told us a lot of little tidbits about the country as we journey along. One day he took Izzy, Navi, and myself to look at the mission’s property outside of the fence. On our way up to the area, he pointed at a hill that rose up about a 1/2 mile away. At the top of the hill was an abandoned house. Scott had mentioned in passing about a village that was at the end of the road that the mission was on. He called it the witchcraft village. Looking up at the abandon house, he told me the reason why he called it that. Several years prior, someone important in the village became very sick. The village shaman took two virgin girls and sacrificed them to make the person well. From what Scott said, it didn’t sound like the person ever got better. Ever since then, the house, where the sacrifice occurred, stood empty.
Human sacrifices are not unheard of in Liberia. From 1987 to 2003, Liberia had two civil wars. One of the staples in the bush, was the fact that human sacrifices occurred to give power to one of the factions. Spirits would be invoked so that one side could gain power over another.
The reality is, we as Christians agree with the majority of the world that there are spirits out there that crave human sacrifice. The spiritual realm is real, and there are evil things seeking to destroy those who play with it. Yet, in our western world, spirituality is something that people say almost flippantly. Back in 2022, 42% of those who considered themselves non-religious in the UK, still considered themselves spiritual (https://www.theosthinktank.co.uk/research/2022/10/31/the-nones-who-are-they-and-what-do-they-believe). That sentiment is supposedly growing in the US by about 20% every year with young people (https://www.churchleadership.com/leading-ideas/the-nones-and-the-spirituality-of-everyday-living/). The idea is, that one can be spiritual, without being religious, because religion, the organized variety, is seen as too restrictive. And so, everything is seen through the lens of a free, purely spiritual lens. Through this lens, Jesus becomes a spiritual guru, rather than the Saving God.
And it’s this idea of the spiritual Jesus which brings us back to our Fall apologetics series, where we are looking at three answers to Jesus’ question, “Who do you say I am?”
Last week we talked about how Jesus asked this question in two ways: Who do the one’s looking in from the outside say he is, and who do the close disciples say he is. When Peter proclaims that Jesus is the Messiah, Jesus beings to explain what that means. Yet, even though Peter is right in attributing the correct title to Jesus, he doesn’t yet understand Jesus’ meaning of Messiah. In fact, when Peter rebuke’s Jesus’ meaning, Jesus rebukes Peter as Satan, because like Satan, Peter was trying to redefine Jesus as Messiah.
We walked away from last week with the understanding that there are two answers to Jesus’ question, “Who do you say I am?” There’s the godly answer, which is defined by Jesus himself, and there is the demonic answer, which tries to redefine Jesus as we decide he should be. As people seeking the true Jesus, we need him to define who he is, rather than us define him from our desires, and we need to be able to communicate Jesus’ definition of his Messiahship to the world.
Therefore, for the next three weeks, we are going to look at three general redefining answers to Jesus’ question, and how they do not line up with the biblical Jesus.
The first answer that we’re going to look at is that Jesus came as a spiritual being. What’s that mean? In this redefinition, it means that Jesus’ goal was not to provide a physical restoration, but a spiritual one. The physical realm is either looked at as an evil entity, something to be shed, or a current state that will exist indefinitely.
There are three types of major groups that take this spiritual Jesus approach.
The first is the Gnostics. Gnosticism is a general term used of several groups who took the idea of Jesus, and combined it with Greek philosophy. In this belief, Jesus is not the Jewish God-man who walked the earth to die for sin, but rather a conglomeration of Jewish mysticism and Greek mythology.
The ancient idea of the Gnostics was that Jesus is a culmination of Æons, which is the progressive emanation of the eternal being as he worked out his spiritual work in the material world. What’s that mean? An Æons is almost like a power source. If we know the story of the woman who touched Jesus’ robe and he responded with, “Who is it that touched me? (Lk. 8:45),” because he felt power go out from him, then we get a sense of this power. Jesus is basically the culmination of a good deity’s power manifested on earth.
Most of what we know of what the Gnostics believed comes from outside sources. One of these sources is Irenaeus in his Against Heresies. Irenaeus tells us that the Gnostics believed that the Christ was a spiritual being who came from the spiritual realm, and rested upon a man named Jesus (3.16.6). At the crucifixion the Christ left the man Jesus, who was then put to death.
Irenaeus writes this, “But inasmuch as all those before mentioned, although they certainly do with their tongue confess one Jesus Christ, make fools of themselves, thinking one thing and saying another; for their hypotheses vary, as I have already shown, alleging, [as they do,] that one Being suffered and was born, and that this was Jesus; but that there was another who descended upon Him, and that this was Christ, who also ascended again; and they argue, that he who proceeded from the Demiurge, or he who was dispensational, or he who sprang from Joseph, was the Being subject to suffering; but upon the latter there descended from the invisible and ineffable [places] the former, whom they assert to be incomprehensible, invisible, and impassible: they thus wander from the truth, because their doctrine departs from Him who is truly God, being ignorant that His only-begotten Word, who is always present with the human race, united to and mingled with His own creation, according to the Father's pleasure, and who became flesh, is Himself Jesus Christ our Lord, who did also suffer for us, and rose again on our behalf, and who will come again in the glory of His Father, to raise up all flesh, and for the manifestation of salvation, and to apply the rule of just judgment to all who were made by Him.”
The concept of the Gnostics, is that a god they name the Demiurge, created the physical realm as to enslave spiritual beings. Jesus the man, is a physical cage. The Christ, the true good and creator spirit, then descended and took over the man Jesus. In the end, it was the man Jesus, not the Christ spirit who was killed on the cross.
The purpose of the Christ doing this was to give secret knowledge to those who could understand. This secret knowledge would then point them to the ability to shed their own evil flesh and ascend into a good spiritual state.
There’s a hint of the early church standing against this idea which comes from 1 John 4:2–3. In this first letter to the Churches, John writes “By this you know the Spirit of God: every spirit that confesses that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is from God, and every spirit that does not confess Jesus is not from God. This is the spirit of the antichrist, which you heard was coming and now is in the world already.”
Jesus would reject the idea that he came only to bring a spiritual release from the physical world. In places such as the “I am” passages, Jesus claimed to be the God who created and sustains both the spiritual and physical world. The physical is not evil in and of itself, but rather has been subjected to evil through human sin. It is sin that Jesus has to deal with first, because it affects both the spiritual and physical states of the creation. The Gnostic Jesus can be seen in modern groups such as those in Scientology.
The second group that answers the question of Jesus with saying he is a spiritual Jesus, are those that hold to what is called a Christ Consciousness.
From the Ananda Church of Self-Realization of Nevada County in California, they write this, “To receive Christ means to tune in to the Christ Consciousness within us. That consciousness is omnipresent; it is with us always. Christ Consciousness is the potential rest point at the center of all conscious vibration … If we would truly receive Christ, we must cross the bridge over the chasm that separates our egos from divine consciousness. To ‘receive’ Christ means to absorb him into ourselves, and to allow him to transform us into himself … Our consciousness must expand to become a receptacle for Infinity. We must ourselves, in other words, become infinite. The ‘power’ to know God is the power of self-expansion to infinity. ( https://www.ananda.org/meditation/meditation-support/articles/receiving-christ-consciousness/)”
Those who practice Christ Consciousness, seek to see that Christ is actual in them. They see Christ, not as a person to be adored and worshiped for saving us from our sins and their penalty, but rather, as a state of awareness and gateway to understanding the universe.
For those who hold to a Christ Consciousness the answer to Jesus’ question, is that he is not the Messiah, who dies for his people, and who will come again to rule, and bring about the new creation. No, he is a guru to open your eyes to your own divinity, and a way to ascend to a higher plain of existence.
John the Baptist shows us that the biblical Jesus is more than what those who adhere Christ Consciousness believe. To his own disciples in John 3 we’re told this, “John answered, ‘A person cannot receive even one thing unless it is given him from heaven. You yourselves bear me witness, that I said, ‘I am not the Christ, but I have been sent before him.’ The one who has the bride is the bridegroom. The friend of the bridegroom, who stands and hears him, rejoices greatly at the bridegroom's voice. Therefore this joy of mine is now complete. He must increase, but I must decrease. (Jn. 3:27-30)”
Those who seek Christ Consciousness say that the goal is to be completely connected to Christ, yet, reject the very core of Jesus’ message: the restoration of our position within God’s created order. Not making us into little divinities, but restoring us to our true humanity.
The final spiritual Jesus is the most recent, and one of the fastest growing heresies within the Church. There is a growing end times belief called Preterism. Within this belief, there are the partial Preterists, and there are the full Preterists. The word preterism, comes from the Latin praeter (pree-tor), which means “past.” The basic idea of Preterism is that all the prophecies in the Bible were fulfilled by AD 70 at the destruction of the temple and Jerusalem.
The difference between a full preterist and a partial preterist is the question, has Jesus’ returned? The partial preterist says no, there are still prophecies of Jesus’ second coming that need to be fulfilled. However the full preterist says that Jesus has come and we are now in his kingdom, led by the Church, until the earth passes away from natural death.
Richard Beck, who is a Senior Fellow at Abilene Christian University, and also teaches at the doctoral level at Fuller Theological Seminary, writes an article called, “On Full Preterism, the Second Coming and Hell.” In that article he writes, “… according to a full preterist eschatology the Second Coming of Jesus has already happened … Basically, according to full preterism, every significant event in relation to salvation history has already occurred. God's kingdom has been established upon earth and Christ has won the victory over sin and death. The biblical story of salvation history has reached The End. (http://experimentaltheology.blogspot.com/2014/06/on-preterism-second-coming-and-hell.html)”
The Jesus of full pretiersim did not physically return and physically rule. The Jesus of full preterism’s goal is to reign spiritually through his people and that’s it. There is no new creation, there is no restoration of the Garden of Eden. These things are spiritually done in the believer’s life.
But this nothing new. Full Preterism is the flower of Hymenaeus’ root. In Second Timothy 2:16-18, Paul talks about two disciples who departed from the faith because they were teaching the that resurrection had already occurred. The teaching was that the people at the time of Paul were now living in the kingdom to come. Paul rejected this idea.
Paul taught that Jesus’ return occurs with the first resurrection (1 Thess. 15-17). At this coming, the bodies of alive believers will be transformed into heavenly bodies, that are the same as Christ’s resurrected body (1 Cor. 15:49, 52).
This return will happen in a physical manner because the angels told the disciples that Jesus would return in the same physical way, as he left (Acts 1:11). Then after this second coming, Jesus would remake the world into a place where there is no sorrow (Rev. 21-22).
The Apostle John wrote of people who believe in a purely spiritual return of Jesus instead of a physical return. In Second John 1:7, John writes, “For many deceivers have gone out into the world, those who do not confess the coming of Jesus Christ in the flesh. Such a one is the deceiver and the antichrist.”
If a person holds that Jesus already returned, not in the physical way that the Scriptures say he will, but in a spiritual way, that person does not follow the Jesus of Scripture, but a Jesus of the antichrist.
A Jesus that focuses on the spiritual at the detriment of the physical is not the Messiah of the Bible. The Messiah seeks to restore both the spiritual and physical. Jesus is the God who created the spiritual and physical realms and then created humans as a hybrid of both. We are physical and spiritual beings, and Jesus’ Messiahship seeks to restore both.
And there will be a day when we will receive a body that is heavenly as we live with God in the new creation. Where a new heaven and new earth, spiritual and physical, live in God’s perfection.
My challenge for you today is the question, do you see Jesus as only a spiritual Messiah? Do you see this world as something to be extracted from rather than a gift from God that needs restoration? It is true that God must restore us spiritually first. That spiritual restoration has to be done before the physical can be addressed, but that doesn’t mean that Jesus has abandoned the physicality of his creation. He himself took on the physical, and he will transform our bodies into eternal physical ones at his return.
Let us always be reminded that we serve a God, whom the Son stands in eternity with the physical scars that prove his love for his creation. Amen.